The Meaning of Altmetrics
نویسنده
چکیده
A range of quantitative methods are today widely used in research evaluation (e.g. Moed et al., 1985; Moed et al., 1995). Recently, with the increasing popularity of social media, and especially the increasing use of social media in scholarly activities, a new field of research has been introduced, namely altmetrics, to investigate the use of social media in research evaluation (Priem & Hemminger, 2010). Although altmetrics does not yet have a widely accepted definition, the idea with altmetrics is that the mentions and other indicators of visibility and awareness a research article and other research products get in social media could tell something about the impact or influence of that research. Earlier altmetric research have in fact found some indications that the social media visibility of a scientific article correlates with more traditional measures of research impact, such as citations, hinting at the value of altmetrics as a rapid source of data about research impact and its potential as a tool for research evaluation (e.g. Bar-Ilan et al., 2012; Mohammadi & Thelwall, 2013; Thelwall et al., 2013a). However, little research has focused on the underlying meaning and actual validity of altmetrics. Are altmetrics measures of impact of research and, if not, what do they measure? How is attention in social media created? Does visibility in social media mean the same thing as citation impact? This paper will review some of the earlier research on the topic and based on the earlier findings discuss challenges with altmetrics and the underlying meaning and validity of altmetrics.
منابع مشابه
Stratifying Altmetrics Indicators Based on Impact Generation Model
Introduction Altmetrics has been a shelter for all possible alternative indicators corresponding to traditional citation-based indicators, with extra focus on online indicators. Altmetrics has been discussed in variety of contexts, such as open science (Mounce, 2013), institutional depositories (Adie, Francois, & Nixon, 2014), publishing industry (Piwowar, 2013) and scholarly communication refo...
متن کاملClassifying Altmetrics by Level of Impact
Introduction In the light of current knowledge we can conclude that altmetrics do not present an alternative for traditional citation-based analysis of research impact (e.g., Haustein et al., 2014). Altmetrics have instead the potential to show some other aspects of research activities and provide a more nuanced view of the impact research has made on various audiences (Liu & Adie, 2013; Piwowa...
متن کاملAlternative Perspectives on Impact: The Potential of ALMs and Altmetrics to Inform Funders about Research Impact
More evidence of the meaning and validity of ALMs and altmetrics, coupled with greater consistency and transparency in their presentation, would enable research funders to explore their potential value and identify appropriate use cases.
متن کاملDo bibliometrics and altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime, altmetrics, and citation data
Purpose: In this study, we address the question of the unclear meaning of altmetrics by studying their relationship with scientific quality (measured by peer assessments). Design: In the first step, we analyze the underlying dimensions of measurement for traditional metrics (citation counts) and altmetrics - by using principal component analysis (PCA). In the second step, we test the relationsh...
متن کاملCan we use altmetrics at the institutional level? A case study analysing the coverage by research areas of four Spanish universities
INTRODUCTION Social media based indicators or altmetrics have been under scrutiny for the last seven years. Their promise as alternative metrics for measuring scholarly impact (Priem, Piwowar, & Hemminger, 2012) is still far from becoming a reality (Torres-Salinas, Cabezas-Clavijo, & Jiménez-Contreras, 2013). Issues with regard to their meaning (Sud & Thelwall, 2014), potential use as alternati...
متن کامل